Relationship of future levels to abatement criterion: Is the predicted future noise level from the project approaching or above 67 dBA Leq(h)? Will it be within 1dBA of the NAC or is it more on the order of 5dBA or more above the NAC? If the future levels are only expected to approach or barely exceed (1 to 3dBA above) the NAC, abatement may not be warranted as it would be if the impact were to be greater.
Insertion Loss (IL): The traffic noise abatement design goal will be 8dBA or more. However, the minimum acceptable insertion loss on the first row of receptors should be 5dBA. The more insertion loss achieved the better the traffic noise abatement, as long as the cost, visual impact, etc., do not become excessive. If a minimum 5dBA insertion loss cannot be achieved, a noise barrier may not be considered to be feasible.
Constructability: Can the noise barrier conceived actually be constructed using routine standard construction methods and techniques? Factors affecting this will include terrain, utilities, safety, bridges, overpasses, and similar difficulties.
Maintainability: Will the noise barrier be constructed in a location that inhibits or complicates proper maintenance?
Safety: A critical factor in determining whether abatement is viable is the impact it may have on safety.
Utilities: The impact of noise barriers on utilities and the reverse must be addressed early in the process. Overhead power lines, underground water, sewer, gas, oil, fiber optics, etc. can have a significant impact on costs and design options.
Drainage: One of the most important elements in the physical location and design of noise abatement is drainage. Directing water along, under, or away from a noise abatement structure can be expensive and cause construction and long-term maintenance problems.
Cost: Cost factors will include the cost of construction (material and labor), the cost of the ROW (including easements, etc.), and any other associated costs. Traffic noise abatement must be achieved in a cost-effective manner. The Traffic Noise Study will include a cost per benefited residence analysis that will be used to assist in the final determination of traffic noise abatement recommendations. If traffic noise abatement cannot be achieved in a cost effective and economically reasonable manner, traffic noise abatement will not be included in the project.
Reasonableness
Land Use Stability: Is the land use for the area expected to change in the future, and if so how? Land uses tolerant of traffic noise may not warrant traffic noise abatement. Land uses where visual exposure is integral to their existence and vitality may not warrant traffic noise abatement.
Local Controls: What has the local governing or jurisdictional body done to control noise sensitive land uses from building adjacent to the Tollway corridor or right-of-way? This implies that if no controls are used, traffic noise abatement is not a very high priority within the community.
Community Desires: Important in determining if traffic noise abatement should be built at any location is whether the affected community really desires abatement. This may require that a survey or community outreach efforts to be conducted to assess the community desires. If the community is not in favor of the noise abatement, the Tollway may choose not to build traffic noise abatement features. If access rights are required, the Tollway will attempt to determine if the affected property owners are willing to trade those rights for the abatement without any exchange of money.
Views of Local Officials: Consideration should be given to the views of the local representative authorities who may be asked to represent the views of the citizens.
Seasonal Usage: Is the site occupied or utilized year round? The evaluation will consider usage rates throughout the year.
Noise Level Changes from Future Build and No-Action Conditions: This implies that traffic noise levels will be very similar, whether or not the project is built. If the difference between the future No-Action and the future Build is 3dBA or less, most people will not notice the change. If the change is 5dBA or greater than, traffic noise abatement consideration should be given more weight.
Antiquity: Who was there first, the noise sensitive site or the roadway? How long has the noise sensitive site been there relative to elevated traffic noise levels? Is the Tollway dealing with original owners or recent purchasers? This implies that someone who builds or buys at a noise sensitive site along an existing roadway (or within the corridor where a roadway is planned for construction) probably doesn’t consider traffic noise a significant factor in their selection of the location.
Aesthetics: This refers to the physical appearance of the wall from both the roadway side and the community side. It also incorporates the landscaping concept, the opinions of the property owners and the local community desires.
Right-of-way Needs Including Access Rights, Easements for Construction and/or Maintenance, and Additional Land: Right-of-way (ROW) impacts can include the cost to obtain access rights, easements and land. It also includes the consideration of purchase, donation, etc. If access rights and easements are required, these will typically be by donation. This is in consideration of the construction of the traffic noise abatement wall for the benefit of the property owners.
Other Environmental Issues: This refers to impacts of traffic noise abatement installation that should be considered on a site-by-site basis. Examples include but not limited to unwanted reflection of sound, pedestrian, bicycle and trail disruption, wetland destruction, groundwater or surface water impacts, animal migration / flight paths, air quality, shading of vegetation, snow accumulation, etc.
5.0 Community Noise Abatement Retrofit Projects (Type II Projects)
The following establishes a cost-shared policy to consider requests for retrofitting noise abatement for projects that are not associated with any Type I improvement. Retrofit projects are subject to available funding and will be evaluated for their merits on a case-by-case basis.
In order for a retrofit project to be considered for Community Noise Abatement Retrofit Project (Type II) funding, the project must have a state or local government sponsor, i.e., a unit of government with the authority to levee taxes. This includes general-purpose units of local governments (e.g. cities, counties and townships) as well as specialized governing districts (e.g. sanitary districts, school districts, forest preserve districts, park districts, airport authorities and publicly owned universities or colleges).
For a project to be considered for Community Noise Abatement Retrofit Project (Type II) funding, the local agency sponsor must prepare documentation in accordance with the traffic noise impact assessment and Traffic Noise Study requirements outlined in Section 3.0 and 4.0 above. The local agency sponsor must pass local zoning ordinances regarding land use, provide all necessary right-of-way, demonstrate the ability and commitment to provide a minimum of 50% of the funding for the project, and agree to maintain the traffic noise abatement structure and right-of-way on the community side of the structure.
The Tollway will give priority consideration to those communities where the Tollway was constructed through an existing neighborhood and where seventy-five percent (75%) or more of the existing noise sensitive receptors within 500-feet of the roadway preceded the roadway. Developments platted or approved after September 30, 2004 will not be eligible for Community Noise Abatement Retrofit Project (Type II) funding consideration.
6.0 Traffic Noise Abatement Techniques
Means and methods for implementation of traffic noise abatement shall be considered based on effectiveness of traffic noise attenuation and cost.
Noise Walls: Noise walls are solid structures built between the highway and the noise sensitive receptors along the roadway. Noise walls are typically constructed of precast concrete panels, cast-in-place concrete, concrete masonry blocks, masonry or wood. Absorptive surfaces will also be considered in areas where noise sensitive receptors may be affected by reflected noise on either side of the wall or in instances where wall heights can be reduced to provide comparable effectiveness. Noise walls can reduce traffic noise levels effectively.
Earth Berms: Traffic noise barriers can be formed from earth mounds along the road -typically called earth berms. Earth berms have a natural appearance and offer opportunities for landscaping; however earth berms can require a significant width across land to accommodate the height necessary to provide the amount of insertion loss required.
Vegetation: If high enough, wide enough, deep enough and dense enough (cannot be seen through), vegetation can decrease the highway traffic noise at a noise sensitive receptor. A 200-foot depth of effective dense vegetation can reduce noise by 10dBA, which can cut the noise volume in half. It is often impractical to plant enough dense vegetation along a road to achieve such reductions; however if dense vegetation is already present possibilities exist where it could be saved with some insertion loss achieved.
Encouraging Compatible Adjacent Land Use: Traffic noise compatible land use planning is a community planning method and proactive responsibility that helps reduce or eliminate traffic noise levels at noise sensitive receptors along roadways. This type of planning means considering land use options and traffic noise issues more effectively so that compatible developments are set up next to the Tollway. Municipalities and counties have the power to encourage traffic noise compatible land use planning by developing effective land use plans, zoning or other legal means (such as subdivision or development standards, building or housing regulations), land or easement purchases and community education to inform citizens, developers and local planners about traffic noise compatible land use planning.
Promote Tollway Policy and Encourage Local Governments: The Illinois Tollway encourages those who plan and develop land, and local governments controlling development or planning land use near existing or planned Tollway locations, to exercise their powers and responsibility to minimize the effect of roadway traffic noise on future sensitive receptors through appropriate land use control. Where such land use controls are not in place, municipalities, townships and counties may not be eligible for traffic noise abatement consideration for sensitive receptors by the Tollway.
Reduction of Traffic Noise at the Source: Reduction of traffic noise impacts by design or treatment of the road surface is the most cost-effective traffic noise control available to the Tollway. Within the group of traffic noise abatement methods that are feasible and reasonable, and after life-cycle cost analysis have selected a pavement type and other technical and financial constraints, the Tollway will use the quietest surface texture available when repaving or reconstructing a roadway in traffic noise sensitive areas.
Traffic Noise Abatement by Others: All future planned developments adjacent to the Tollway should include a provision in the Subdivision Plat approval requirements that mandates the developer to place a covenant running with the land notifying perspective purchasers that traffic noise abatement will not be provided by the Illinois Tollway. The Tollway encourages developers and local governments to coordinate their efforts to mitigate roadway traffic noise. This must be done without encroachment on the Tollway right-of-way, unless it is determined to be necessary, and authority granted to permit others to construct a sound barrier, berm or landscape in the Tollway’s right-of-way. The design must meet the Illinois Tollway’s geometric, structural, safety and maintenance standards. The Tollway shall assume no liability review authority or responsibility of any kind for the structural integrity or acoustical effectiveness of traffic noise abatement sound barriers constructed by others.
Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC)*
Hourly A-Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)
Land Use Category |
Leq(h) dBA |
Description of Land Use Category |
A |
57
(Exterior) |
Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. |
B |
67
(Exterior) |
Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, hotels, schools churches, libraries, and hospitals. |
C |
72
(Exterior) |
Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above. |
D |
-- |
Undeveloped lands. |
E** |
52
(Interior)
|
Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and auditoriums. |
* Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 772 (23 CFR Part 772)
** Use of interior noise levels shall be limited (on a case-by-case basis) to situations where exterior noise levels are not applicable, i.e., where there are no exterior activities to be affected by traffic noise, or where exterior activities are far from or physically shielded from the roadway in a manner that prevents an impact on exterior activities.
Note: The Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) are noise impact thresholds for considering abatement. (Abatement must be considered when predicted traffic noise levels for the design year approach [i.e., are within 1 decibel of] or exceed the noise abatement criteria, or when the predicted traffic noise levels are substantially higher [i.e., are more than 14 decibels greater] than the existing noise level.) The Noise Abatement Criteria are not attenuation design criteria or targets. The goal of noise abatement measures is to achieve a substantial reduction in future noise levels. The reductions may or may not result in future noise levels at or below the Noise Abatement Criteria.